Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
State Medical Boards: Study Ranks Hawaii Worst, Wyoming Best
On April 19, consumer advocacy group Public Citizen released its ranking of state medical boards, which was based on data from the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) that tallied the number of disciplinary actions taken against doctors in the years 2002-2004. States that disciplined doctors most often were ranked higher than those with fewer disciplinary actions, on the theory that doctors are making mistakes everywhere but that some states turn a blind eye while others do not. Hawaii, with 1.44 actions per 1000 physicians, was ranked lowest, followed by Delaware, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Maryland. Wyoming, with 10.04 serious actions per 1000 physicians, was ranked highest, followed by Kentucky, North Dakota, Alaska and Oklahoma. In a statement issued by the group, Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, said, “These data again raise serious questions about the extent to which patients in many of these states with poorer records of serious doctor discipline are being protected from physicians who might well be barred from practice in states with boards that are doing a better job of disciplining physicians. It is quite possible that patients are being injured or killed more often in states with poor doctor disciplinary records than in states with consistently high performance.”
Joint Commission International Center for Patient Safety Announces New Web Site
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?