Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When negotiating a long-term lease, the landlord and the tenant should specifically agree upon the condition that the premises will be in at the time of delivery by the landlord to the tenant. Too often phrases such as “vanilla box,” “warm vanilla box” and “as-is condition” are utilized by leasing representatives to describe generically the condition that the premises will be in at the time of delivery. However, the differences between what each party means by those terms can be dramatic. By specifically addressing the condition of the premises, landlords and tenants may avoid costly disputes once the lease has been executed and the landlord delivers the premises. This article addresses the terminology and the common pitfalls associated with the terms “vanilla box,” “warm vanilla box” and “as-is condition.”
Vanilla Box
While the definitions may vary greatly amongst leasing professionals as to what the term “vanilla box” means, the general understanding in the industry is that in order to be in “vanilla box” condition, the premises will have a floor (although not necessarily a level floor), metal demising studs with drywall/sheetrock on the outside or corridor side of the demising studs, a roof deck above (with no finished ceiling) and utilities may or may not be available. Since bringing utilities to the premises, leveling the floors, and similar type construction work involves a great deal of construction time and cost, the parties would be wise to address in a specific work letter those items that will be included in the “vanilla box.” In particular, the following questions should be answered regarding the condition of the “vanilla box” space:
Further, for any work that will require the use of the landlord's contractors, a detailed list should be prepared to identify the contractors that the tenant must utilize. At a minimum, a savvy tenant should request that the cost for work performed by contractors designated by the landlord should be comparable with that charged by other third-party contractors in the area where the retail facility is located. Further, because the tenant will have no reasonable alternatives other than using the landlord's designated contractors and no real recourse for any delay that is caused by the landlord's contractors, the tenant should request a statement that the landlord's contractors will not unreasonably delay the tenant's construction work.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?