Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Defending the Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Case

By Eric L. Probst
June 27, 2005

Each year, millions of Americans, including some children, suffer non-penetrating, or closed, head injuries. When lawsuits result, they involve complex medical, academic, and legal issues. When the plaintiff is a child, the defense attorney faces numerous additional challenges in defending the matter. Certain discovery tools are necessary to simplify and defend the pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) lawsuit. These tools, although also used in traditional personal injury cases, take on added significance because of the age of the plaintiff and the nature of the injury.

The first step is to define the plaintiff. The term “pediatric” encompasses birth through adolescence. Age, however, cannot be the exclusive defining factor because the child's status as a student also plays a role. Thus, the discovery tools explained below apply to the injured college student as well. More important, counsel must be aware of factors — race, socioeconomic background, family relationships, education, state of residence, and health — besides the child's age that influence the child's development. The pediatric plaintiff must be treated by counsel as a complex individual whose development is shaped by these factors.

The next step is to define a “traumatic brain injury.” A TBI can be defined as an injury from any source that “disturbs or damages brain function.” Blackwell, Powers, Weed: Life Care Planning for Traumatic Brain Injury, 1 (1994). Brain injuries are caused by a variety of events: assaults, strokes, tumors, motor vehicle accidents, sporting event injuries, falls, workplace accidents, medical malpractice, and illicit drug use. While the cause of the injury is certainly important, the defense attorney also must understand and appreciate the impact of the injury on the child's brain function. To fully develop the defense liability and damage strategy, the attorney has to examine the child's pre-accident medical history and the injury's effect on the child's academic, cognitive, mental and emotional development. The defense attorney — and for that matter the plaintiff's attorney — must treat the pediatric-plaintiff as a unique individual and not stereotype the child's injury based upon other closed-head trauma cases the attorney has litigated.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.