Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Among the more arduous tasks for an attorney handling a matrimonial case is the negotiation of the financial aspects, primarily support and maintenance and the division and distribution of marital property. In many cases, exhaustive financial disclosure is necessary; evaluations of property are obtained and challenged, and months of negotiations and legal services result, finally, in a resolution of the financial issues.
Once the major issues of the case are settled, an agreement is prepared so that the acrimony and bitterness of the parties can hopefully become history. The deal is set, and the parties proceed to restructure their lives for a better future in reliance upon the agreement. It is usual that the settlement agreement is executory; that is, there is required of the parties future performance of the obligations that they assumed under the provisions of the agreement. Commonly, the obligations include future payments or distributions of marital property. Although the agreement may determine the respective shares and entitlement of each party, the actual distribution frequently does not take place until a later date.
For example, if a husband owns a business, or an interest in a business, the wife may be entitled to a portion of the value of the husband's interest in that business. After it has been evaluated, it is not uncommon that there is insufficient cash flow to fund the buyout of the wife's interest in one lump sum at the time of the settlement. Consequently, there are often payout arrangements extending sometimes over a period of years.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?