Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Net Charity Registration Requirements
Historically, states, not the federal government, have been responsible for regulating charities. And it seems a logical given: State regulation is designed to protect consumers of the individual states from fraud and general abuse; the federal government's role is generally limited to providing tax incentives that benefit, or are aimed at benefiting, valid charities.
All well and good.
As part of states' efforts to shield their residents against the fraud and other crime that might be perpetrated against them in the name of a sham charity, most charitable organizations must register within the state in which they are domiciled. Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia, for instance, require charities to register in-state, and to file financial and other information prior to soliciting in those states. States, however, also routinely impose their registration requirements on out-of-state charities that solicit in state in traditional ways (eg, by having solicitors enter the state) or over the Internet. Charitable organizations that use the Internet to solicit contributions must register if they use their Internet solicitation specifically to target people in that state, or receive Internet contributions from the state on a repeated, ongoing basis, or what's defined as “a substantial basis.”
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.