Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent search of Amazon.com generated more than 2200 publications related to intellectual property. The publications covered a broad array of subjects including law, valuation, licensing, finance, management, and globalization. While this finding is illustrative of an expanding interest in intellectual property, the area of IP finance in particular is rapidly evolving and has the potential for significant growth.
There are several reasons to be optimistic about the future of IP finance including an increasing appreciation for the value attributable to IP, the recognition of IP as its own asset class, enhanced access to better information, and a more receptive finance community. In spite of these positive trends, the number and size of IP finance deals has been limited due to the unique nature of IP and the challenges associated with realizing its value. Recently, however, several new IP-focused initiatives and transactions provide evidence of an evolving marketplace that is adapting to overcome the challenges that have historically faced IP-based finance transactions.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.