Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cameo Clips

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
July 28, 2005

Music Royalty Claims

The U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico dismissed a royalties-based suit by salsa artist Gilberto Santa Rosa. Santa Rosa v. Combo Records, 04-1405 (JAG). The district court first decided on Santa Rosa's contract claims (Santa Rosa didn't have a copy but claimed to have entered into a contract with Combo Records as early as 1978) that: “Santa Rosa does not remember what the contract contained, and lacks any proof of its formation from witnesses or a record of the instrument. … Because this Court cannot find an express or an implied contract without any facts, nor any sort of enforceable promise, the Court will not address Santa Rosa's claim of breach nor grant his request to rescind the contract.”

The court next found Santa Rosa's claim for a declaration of ownership of the recordings at issue time-barred by the Copyright Act's 3-year statute of limitations, stating: “Santa Rosa did not state any facts that explain his decades-long absence of concern [of non-payment of royalties] and still support a finding that he was reasonably diligent in protecting his interests.” Finally, the court concluded on Santa Rosa's Lanham Act claim alleging that his name had been omitted from the recordings: “Santa Rosa has to rely on the laws designed to address his concerns as the inventor and not producer or manufacturer of a product to make his claim against Combo Records; in this case, the Copyright Act and not the Lanham Act.”


Film Production/Character Depictions

The producers and distributors of the film “Hardball” were entitled to summary judgment in a suit by an individual who claimed that the unflattering depiction of a character in the movie amounted to defamation, false light and related personal-rights violations, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, ruled. Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 01 C 6721. Plaintiff Robert Muzikowski had been portrayed in the nonfiction book “Hardball: A Season in the Projects,” to which Paramount bought the film rights, for his work in starting baseball teams for young people. The district initially dismissed Muzikowski's suit for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?