Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There is a newly urgent push from outside the pharmaceutical research and development community to get drug firms and the government to disclose the results of all tests conducted on new drugs and to immediately reveal information about problems that develop after those drugs go on the market. Consumers and health care providers say they're tired of finding out belatedly that negative information has come to light about the drugs they take or prescribe.
Of course, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has for years been looking out for the public by requiring extensive testing of all new drugs before they can be placed on the market, but critics charge that the agency, being intimately tied to the very industry it is policing, has not done enough. High on the list of concerns is the fact that after a drug is approved, its effects on consumers are not generally studied at present.
Consumer advocates have taken up the slack they see in the FDA's oversight of the drug manufacturing industry. For example, consumer group Public Citizen recently announced it had launched an updated Web site, www.WorstPills.org, to provide consumers with information about drugs the group considers unsafe or ineffective. The group, whose drug information Web site is accessible by subscription, claims that nearly 200 drugs on the market today are unsafe or ineffective.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?