Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recently, a prominent Georgia trial lawyer was ordered to pay his former paramour $6 million in child support payments. Willie Gary, whose law practice is based in Florida, claimed in court papers to have a net worth of $60 million. Gowins v. Gary, No. 2004CV88406. (Fult. Super. Ct., July 15, 2004). Gary is known in Georgia law circles for his representation of race discrimination plaintiffs against The Coca-Cola Co., and Centennial Olympic Park bombing victims suing Atlanta Olympic organizers. His Web site boasts of winning a $240 million verdict against The Walt Disney Co. in 2001 in an intellectual property theft case; a $139.6 million verdict against brewer Anheuser-Busch; and a half-billion-dollar verdict against the Loewen Group, a large Canadian funeral-home chain.
The child support judgment orders Gary to pay $28,000 per month — for 16 years — to an Atlanta woman who bore him twins after their brief romantic relationship 5 years ago. Gary agreed to pay $175,000 for “support and maintenance of the children” and for a down payment on a home in Georgia for the mother and twins. He is also obligated to pay for the children's medical, dental and hospitalization insurance, maintain life insurance and prepay college tuition for the twins.
According to Jay D. Bennett, a partner at Alston & Bird, who initially handled the case for the plaintiff and drafted the settlement agreement later adopted by the judge, the agreement also calls for Gary to pay $30,000 to Alston & Bird to cover attorney fees.
Details of the Case
Gary wanted to pay only $5000 per month, according to the order. The judge noted that Gary had argued that the twins' mother, Diana Gowins, misspent the child support money he already had given her to further “her lifestyle and questionable investments.” Gary, who is married and has four other adult children with his wife, Gloria Gary, has acknowledged paternity of the twins. Gowins met Gary while she was training for the 2000 Olympic Games heptathlon, where Gowins had sought out Gary as a sponsor.
Gowins has been a stay-at-home mother since giving birth to the twins in November 2000. Gary and Gowins initially attempted to resolve their differences out of the public eye. An agreement was reached in July 2002, and the couple sought to have it enforced in Walker County in order to avoid publicity to Gary. Walker Superior Court Chief Judge Jon B. Wood entered a final judgment on Nov. 4, 2003, finding the settlement agreement enforceable. However, he later set aside the ruling, saying his court had no jurisdiction over the parties because neither one ever lived in Walker County.
The dispute before Fulton Superior Court Judge Cynthia D. Wright involved Gary's contention that the settlement agreement originally called on him to pay $14,000 per month, not $14,000 per child per month. Later, he asked Wright to reduce the monthly figure to $5000 per month, according to the order. Gary also said the language concerning $14,000 per month per child in the settlement agreement had been a “mutual mistake of fact.” Wright, however, found that Gary did not carry his burden of “proving that both parties intended a total support amount of $14,000.” She held that there was “a unilateral mistake based upon his negligence in failing to read the final or even a draft version.”
Wright also denied Gary's request that the case be sealed. Wright's order noted that Gary claims a net worth of more than $60 million and his income tax returns for the years 2000-2002 showed total income of $9.7 million, $28.5 million and $17.2 million, respectively. Although not mentioned in the order, Gary boasts on his firm's Web site of having been profiled on “Lifestyles of the Rich & Famous.” He also owns a custom-designed Boeing 737 nicknamed “Wings of Justice II.” According to court documents, Gary said he lived in a 25,000-square-foot home worth $5.4 million with four Bentleys, a Rolls Royce and a Lexus truck parked in the garage. His Boeing 737 has an operating cost of $150,000 per month. He also estimated his stake in his firm to be worth $20 million.
Gary is chairman of the Atlanta-based Black Family Channel, which, according to his Web site, is “the nation's only African-American owned and operated 24-hour cable channel devoted to wholesome 'family values' programming aimed at urban viewers.”
Recently, a prominent Georgia trial lawyer was ordered to pay his former paramour $6 million in child support payments. Willie Gary, whose law practice is based in Florida, claimed in court papers to have a net worth of $60 million. Gowins v. Gary, No. 2004CV88406. (Fult. Super. Ct., July 15, 2004). Gary is known in Georgia law circles for his representation of race discrimination plaintiffs against The Coca-Cola Co., and Centennial Olympic Park bombing victims suing Atlanta Olympic organizers. His Web site boasts of winning a $240 million verdict against
The child support judgment orders Gary to pay $28,000 per month — for 16 years — to an Atlanta woman who bore him twins after their brief romantic relationship 5 years ago. Gary agreed to pay $175,000 for “support and maintenance of the children” and for a down payment on a home in Georgia for the mother and twins. He is also obligated to pay for the children's medical, dental and hospitalization insurance, maintain life insurance and prepay college tuition for the twins.
According to Jay D. Bennett, a partner at
Details of the Case
Gary wanted to pay only $5000 per month, according to the order. The judge noted that Gary had argued that the twins' mother, Diana Gowins, misspent the child support money he already had given her to further “her lifestyle and questionable investments.” Gary, who is married and has four other adult children with his wife, Gloria Gary, has acknowledged paternity of the twins. Gowins met Gary while she was training for the 2000 Olympic Games heptathlon, where Gowins had sought out Gary as a sponsor.
Gowins has been a stay-at-home mother since giving birth to the twins in November 2000. Gary and Gowins initially attempted to resolve their differences out of the public eye. An agreement was reached in July 2002, and the couple sought to have it enforced in Walker County in order to avoid publicity to Gary. Walker Superior Court Chief Judge Jon B. Wood entered a final judgment on Nov. 4, 2003, finding the settlement agreement enforceable. However, he later set aside the ruling, saying his court had no jurisdiction over the parties because neither one ever lived in Walker County.
The dispute before Fulton Superior Court Judge Cynthia D. Wright involved Gary's contention that the settlement agreement originally called on him to pay $14,000 per month, not $14,000 per child per month. Later, he asked Wright to reduce the monthly figure to $5000 per month, according to the order. Gary also said the language concerning $14,000 per month per child in the settlement agreement had been a “mutual mistake of fact.” Wright, however, found that Gary did not carry his burden of “proving that both parties intended a total support amount of $14,000.” She held that there was “a unilateral mistake based upon his negligence in failing to read the final or even a draft version.”
Wright also denied Gary's request that the case be sealed. Wright's order noted that Gary claims a net worth of more than $60 million and his income tax returns for the years 2000-2002 showed total income of $9.7 million, $28.5 million and $17.2 million, respectively. Although not mentioned in the order, Gary boasts on his firm's Web site of having been profiled on “Lifestyles of the Rich & Famous.” He also owns a custom-designed
Gary is chairman of the Atlanta-based Black Family Channel, which, according to his Web site, is “the nation's only African-American owned and operated 24-hour cable channel devoted to wholesome 'family values' programming aimed at urban viewers.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
As organizations enhance their e-discovery processes and infrastructure, the expectation to leverage technology to maximize service delivery increases. However, legal professionals must balance innovation with humanity.
The business-law issue of whether and when a corporate defendant is considered distinct from its affiliated entities emerged on December 11 at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the justices confronting whether a non-defendant’s affiliate’s revenue can be part of a judge’s calculation of the monetary remedy for the corporate defendant’s infringement of a trademark.
The most forward-thinking companies embrace AI with complete confidence because they have created governance programs that serve as guardrails for this incredible new technology. Effective governance ensures AI consistently aligns with an organization’s best interests, safeguarding against potential risks while unlocking its full potential.
It’s time for our annual poll of experts on what they expect 2025 to bring in legal tech, including generative AI (of course), e-discovery, and more.
AI’s rapid market proliferation and regulatory expansion mirrors privacy’s, and businesses should model their contractual AI compliance on the successes of privacy law’s DPA and BAA.