Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Art As an Asset in Divorce

By Beverly Schreiber Jacoby
August 31, 2005

Death, divorce and debt” are the bread and butter of the art and antiques market, as every art world professional knows. Through good times and bad, these life cycle events frequently trigger sales and other transactions. With divorce, however, if emotions are not already present prior to filing papers, the process itself tends to intensify anger and mistrust between opposing sides.

Divorcing spouses often have competing interests, and neither party may be in a frame of mind to compromise. If divorcing New Yorkers, for instance, are forced to choose between the Fifth Avenue apartment and the house in the Hamptons, not to mention the box at the U.S. Open or courtside seats at the Knicks, and if told they must share the Microsoft stock and the 401(k), by the time they get around to dealing with art and antiques, they may not find themselves in the mood to be practical. If the parties behave as if there needs to be a winner and a loser, there is a great risk that instead of preserving the full value of their collections, they may erode the worth of the marital estate. Like the baby in the Judgment of Solomon, the painting cannot be cut in half. Spouses may have a special attachment to certain pieces, especially when collecting is a shared activity within the marriage.

A 'Collecting Unit'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.