Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FDA Issues Health Advisory for 'Morning After' Pill
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is investigating recently reported serious adverse events associated with mifepristone (trade name Mifeprex', also known as RU-486, or the “Morning After” pill), issued a public health advisory July 19 highlighting the risk of sepsis when undergoing medical abortion using Mifeprex and misoprostol in a manner that is not consistent with the approved labeling. Between Septem-ber 2003 to June 2005, four deaths were blamed on these drugs. The bacteria thought to have caused the fatal infection has been identified in two of the cases. The other two cases are under investigation by the FDA in cooperation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state and local health departments and the manufacturer of Mifeprex. Doctors are urged to have a higher level of suspicion for sepsis in their patients taking Mifeprex. The FDA, which has of late been accused of “sitting on” information about possible drug dangers, seems to be taking a more open attitude about informing the public and health care community when drug problems occur. Dr. Steven Galson, Acting Director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement released along with the warning about Mifeprex, “The FDA is committed to sharing emerging drug information with the public and we believe it is important to share with healthcare providers and patients the latest serious reports of infection associated with this drug that we have received.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.