Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Until recently, the subject of corporate minutes seemed about as interesting ' and received about as much attention ' as watching paint dry. However, for a number of reasons, the subject now receives considerable attention from the legal and corporate governance communities, and from boards of directors themselves.
Why the 'Sudden' Interest in Minutes?
The primary reason for this renewed interest is concern that inadequate or incomplete minutes can increase the exposure of directors and others ' possibly including corporate secretaries ' to litigation or even criminal prosecution. Section 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 states that any person who “knowingly … conceals, covers up or falsifies, or makes a false entry in any … document with the intent to impede, obstruct or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter …” can be subject to fines and/or a prison term of up to 20 years. While it is debatable whether this language was intended to apply to minutes, representatives of the Justice Department's Enron Task Force have resolved any debate by publicly stating that incomplete and/or inadequate minutes can serve as the basis for prosecutions for obstruction of justice. The concerns raised by this statement have been reinforced by the trial-related publicity and intense scrutiny being given to the deliberations of the compensation committees of The Walt Disney Company and Tyco International, Ltd.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?