Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Renewal Interests/Heirs
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decided that renewal interests triggered after Puerto Rican composer Guillermo Venegas-Llo-veras died should be split 50% to his widow and 50% among his children. Venegas-Hernandez v. Asociacion De Compositores Y Editoresde, 04-1934. The decision is in line with the Sixth Circuit's view in Broadcast Music Inc. v. Roger Miller Music Inc., 396 F.3d 762 (6th Cir. 2005). The First Circuit noted in an unpublished opinion: “Policy considerations favor the 50-50 solution over per capita division. … A majority of states give the widow a 50% or greater interest in her husband's estate if he dies intestate, even with multiple children.”
Record Distribution/Interference With Business Relationship
A magistrate for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida ruled that a preliminary injunction should be issued to bar TVT Records from interfering with the release of an album of material by Miami rapper Pitbull recorded before he signed with TVT. Slip-N-Slide Records Inc. v. TVT Records LLC, 05-21113. Slip-N-Slide Records sought to release early Pitbull recordings on the album “Welcome to the 305″ after TVT released the best-selling Pitbull album “M.I.A.M.I.” TVT then sent cease-and-desist letters to numerous distributors to block the “305″ release. The magistrate found that Slip-N-Slide had established a likelihood of success on a claim of intentional interference with business relationship by TVT. The magistrate also determined that “Welcome to 305″ had to be issued immediately to benefit from the year-end holiday sales and that there was a lack of evidence on TVT's counterclaim that Slip-N-Slide violated rights in TVT's Pitbull logo. (The magistrate found “extremely significant” that Pitbull wasn't a party to the lawsuit nor had complained of the “305″ release.) But the magistrate instructed Slip-N-Slide to place a label on all copies of “305″ stating “Contains Previously Released Material.”
Music Royalties/Conversion Claim
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?