Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Offers of Judgment and Copyright Litigation
Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides a defendant with a means to encourage parties to settle their litigation before trial. A defendant may serve a plaintiff with an “an offer to allow judgment to be taken against [defendant] for the money or property or to the effect specified in the offer, with costs then accrued.” F.R.C.P. 68. If the offer is not accepted by the plaintiff, and the “judgment finally obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer, the offeree must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer.” Id.
Rule 68 by its own terms only refers to “costs”; but the Supreme Court has held that “costs” includes attorney's fees when the underlying statute at issue includes attorney's fees in its definition of costs. See Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 3012 (1985). However, the Copyright Act provides that only the “prevailing party” in a copyright infringement suit may collect its attorney's fees as part of the costs the court can award at its discretion. 17 U.S.C. '505.
What is the relationship between Federal Rule 68 and Section 505 of the Copyright Act? If the defendant in a copyright litigation makes an offer of judgment that the plaintiff refuses, and the plaintiff is awarded damages for infringement that are less than the amount offered by defendant in the offer of judgment, do the post-offer “costs” governed by Rule 68 to which the defendant is entitled include attorney's fees? In other words, can a non-prevailing party collect attorney's fees under Rule 68 in a copyright litigation?
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?