Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Index

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 29, 2005

Cooperatives & Condominiums

Condo Borrowing Without Unit Owner Approval; Bylaw Violation

Kwiecinski v. Sea Breeze II Condominium Assn.

* * *

Development

Mandatory Injunction to Remove Building Held Premature

Matter of Angiolillo v. Town of Greenburgh

* * *

Landlord & Tenant

Partial Eviction Brings Partial Rent Abatement

Eastside Exhibition Corp. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp.

Section 8 Termination Requires Action by Landlord

7 Highland Management Corp. v. McCray

Illegal Loft Contract Precludes Use and Occupancy Award

Kee Yip Realty Corp. v. Wolinsky

Four-Year Rule Does Not Bar Challenges to Longevity Increases

Matter of Ador Realty, LLC v. DHCR

* * *

Real Property Law

Easement Holder May Not Compel Removal of Neighboring Home

Nat Holding Corp. v. Banks

When Easement Performance Impossible, Dominant Owner May Not Recover Damages

Chateau Rive Corp. v. Enclave Development Associates

Mortgagee Payment to Non-Mortgagor; Fraudulent Transfer Liability

Vazquez v. Riaz

Cooperatives & Condominiums

Condo Borrowing Without Unit Owner Approval; Bylaw Violation

Kwiecinski v. Sea Breeze II Condominium Assn.

* * *

Development

Mandatory Injunction to Remove Building Held Premature

Matter of Angiolillo v. Town of Greenburgh

* * *

Landlord & Tenant

Partial Eviction Brings Partial Rent Abatement

Eastside Exhibition Corp. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp.

Section 8 Termination Requires Action by Landlord

7 Highland Management Corp. v. McCray

Illegal Loft Contract Precludes Use and Occupancy Award

Kee Yip Realty Corp. v. Wolinsky

Four-Year Rule Does Not Bar Challenges to Longevity Increases

Matter of Ador Realty, LLC v. DHCR

* * *

Real Property Law

Easement Holder May Not Compel Removal of Neighboring Home

Nat Holding Corp. v. Banks

When Easement Performance Impossible, Dominant Owner May Not Recover Damages

Chateau Rive Corp. v. Enclave Development Associates

Mortgagee Payment to Non-Mortgagor; Fraudulent Transfer Liability

Vazquez v. Riaz

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.