Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Subrogation Claims in Bankruptcy

By Adam L. Rosen and Kristina M. Wesch
November 29, 2005

In many cases, a creditor in a bankruptcy case (the 'Primary Creditor') has the benefit of a guaranty, an escrow, or a letter of credit provided by a third party (the 'Subrogee') to which it can turn in order to satisfy its claim against the debtor. When the Subrogee pays the debtor's obligation to the Primary Creditor after the debtor has filed a petition in bankruptcy, the Subrogee will in most cases be entitled to assert a subrogation claim against the debtor in the bankruptcy case. Below, we discuss the relevant considerations in determining whether a subrogation claim is valid.

Subrogation

Subrogation is 'the substitution of one party in place of another with reference to a lawful claim or right, so that the one who is substituted succeeds to the position of the other in relation to the other's claim or right.' Robbins International, Inc. v. Robbins MBW Corp. (In the Matter of Robbins International, Inc.), 275 B.R. 456, 470 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (citing The Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, New York, NY (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 89 F.3d 942, 947 (2d Cir. 1996)). Subrogation is an equitable remedy that is a derivative right, arising from satisfaction of a claim held by a third party against another party. In re Hamada, 291 F.3d 645, 649 (9th Cir. 2002). See also See Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, New York, NY (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 89 F.3d 942, 948 (2d Cir. 1996).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.