Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Marketplace

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
December 02, 2005

In connection with a report published by Fitch Ratings exploring the quantitative impact of the Basel II capital charges on a range of structured transactions typical of deals in the marketplace, the company found that Basel II will have an important effect on the securitization activity of banks by creating a new framework for how banks measure and allocate capital against credit risk.

The report, Basel II: The 'Bottom-line' Impact on Securitization Markets, evaluates the amount of Basel II capital that banks must hold on an unsecuritized pool of assets in comparison to holding a securitized structure of these same assets. It details how the new capital framework might affect investment flows within structured product markets. Fitch finds that banks could potentially face lower capital charges by investing in rated securitization structures rather than by directly holding a comparable pool of unsecuritized assets, particularly for credit card asset-backed securities (“ABS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), and residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). Fitch also notes that Basel II could influence how banks structure their securitization deals as they “will face strong pressures under Basel II to minimize their exposure to sub-investment grade tranches, given the significant amount of regulatory capital they will have to hold against these positions,” according to Krishnan Ramadurai, Senior Director, Financial Institutions, Fitch Ratings.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.