Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In connection with a report published by Fitch Ratings exploring the quantitative impact of the Basel II capital charges on a range of structured transactions typical of deals in the marketplace, the company found that Basel II will have an important effect on the securitization activity of banks by creating a new framework for how banks measure and allocate capital against credit risk.
The report, Basel II: The 'Bottom-line' Impact on Securitization Markets, evaluates the amount of Basel II capital that banks must hold on an unsecuritized pool of assets in comparison to holding a securitized structure of these same assets. It details how the new capital framework might affect investment flows within structured product markets. Fitch finds that banks could potentially face lower capital charges by investing in rated securitization structures rather than by directly holding a comparable pool of unsecuritized assets, particularly for credit card asset-backed securities (“ABS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), and residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). Fitch also notes that Basel II could influence how banks structure their securitization deals as they “will face strong pressures under Basel II to minimize their exposure to sub-investment grade tranches, given the significant amount of regulatory capital they will have to hold against these positions,” according to Krishnan Ramadurai, Senior Director, Financial Institutions, Fitch Ratings.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.