Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Leasing Hotline
RECAPTURE CLAUSE
A landlord may not rely upon a recapture clause in a lease where the tenant never commenced occupation of the premises. Blinds To Go., Inc. v. Times Plaza Development, L.P., Index No. 1932/03, 2004-04427, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department, June 20, 2005.
The landlord and tenant entered into a lease for commercial space. The tenant never occupied the space, and the landlord relet the premises to another commercial tenant. The tenant then commenced an action against the landlord; the landlord made a pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint based upon the recapture clause in the parties' lease. The trial court granted the landlord's pre-answer motion. The tenant appealed, and the appellate court reversed. The appellate court held that the landlord incorrectly relied upon the recapture clause because the tenant had never occupied the premises. The appellate court reinstated the complaint.
RECAPTURE CLAUSE
A landlord may not rely upon a recapture clause in a lease where the tenant never commenced occupation of the premises. Blinds To Go., Inc. v. Times Plaza Development, L.P., Index No. 1932/03, 2004-04427, Supreme Court of
The landlord and tenant entered into a lease for commercial space. The tenant never occupied the space, and the landlord relet the premises to another commercial tenant. The tenant then commenced an action against the landlord; the landlord made a pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint based upon the recapture clause in the parties' lease. The trial court granted the landlord's pre-answer motion. The tenant appealed, and the appellate court reversed. The appellate court held that the landlord incorrectly relied upon the recapture clause because the tenant had never occupied the premises. The appellate court reinstated the complaint.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.