Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Procedural Matters Rule in Several Recent Franchisor-Franchisee Disputes
Bring back the days when the reported decisions were filled with cases concerning disputes over the quality of the franchise system and whether the parties had complied with their respective obligations to make the franchise relationship work. A seagull's view of the recent decisions involving franchise relationships suggests that even though most of the text of a franchise agreement is devoted to describing the parties' rights and obligations relating to the granting, construction, and operation of the franchise, when the franchise relationship becomes fractured, the field of battle more often than not moves not to the substantive relationship of the parties, but to what might be termed the legalese portions of the franchise agreement and procedural matters ' arbitration, jurisdiction, statutes of limitations, whether preliminary injunctions should be granted, choice of forum, and choice of state law ' to name only a few of these non-substantive issues. The meat of the franchise relationship becomes secondary. The cynic in our audience might say that the sideshows at the circus have moved to center ring.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.