Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE
Lease provisions restricting the assignment of a lease are to be construed strictly because New York law disfavors restrictions on assigning or subletting. Ring v. Mpath Interactive Inc., Gamespy Industries, Inc., and Hearme, 04-3170-cv(L), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, May 6, 2005.
The tenants wished to sublet or assign the premises, and the landlord withheld consent. The parties sought judicial interpretation of their rights and obligations under the lease. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the tenants. The appellate court affirmed and held that New York law disfavors restrictions on assigning or subletting. Here, the tenants were able to demonstrate that nothing evidenced reasonable grounds for the landlord's refusal of consent. Even though the landlord argued that the potential assignee's financial condition was questionable, it was unable to show substantial proof and specific facts to overcome summary judgment. The appellate court did not find convincing the landlord's argument that defects in the notice of assignment prohibited its consent to assignment and held that such minor procedural errors should not have prohibited the assignment of the lease.
ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE
Lease provisions restricting the assignment of a lease are to be construed strictly because
The tenants wished to sublet or assign the premises, and the landlord withheld consent. The parties sought judicial interpretation of their rights and obligations under the lease. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the tenants. The appellate court affirmed and held that
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.