Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Recent Developments from Around the States

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
January 26, 2006

NJ Court Finds Duty on Part of Employer to Exercise Reasonable Care on Employee's Viewing of Child Pornography

The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division has held that when an employer has actual or implied knowledge that an employee is using his/her work computer to view pornography, and possibly child pornography, that employer has a duty to investigate and interfere with these activities such that they do not result in harm to third parties. Doe v. XYC Corporation, 2005 WL 3527015 (Dec. 27).

Plaintiff Jane Doe filed an action on behalf of her minor daughter Jill Doe in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County, against Defendant XYC Corporation. The complaint alleged that because the company knew or should have known that its employee, Jane's husband and Jill's stepfather, was using his work computer to view and download child pornography, XYC had a duty to report Employee to the authorities, and that XYC negligently breached that duty, resulting in Employee's ability to continue photographing and molesting Jill Doe. The employee in question, an accountant for XYC, had been cited and reprimanded on numerous occasions for accessing pornographic cites, including child pornography, at his workstation. In June 2001, Employee, who had been secretly photographing and videotaping his 10-year-old stepdaughter at home in nude and semi-nude positions, transmitted three of these photos over the Internet from his work computer in order to gain access to a child pornography site. Following a search of his work space and computer by the Prosecutor's Office, which turned up numerous pornographic images and communications on child pornography cites, Employee was arrested. The lower court, responding to Jane Doe's specific allegations, granted summary judgment for Defendant both because Employee's conduct at home, the illicit photographing and molesting of Jill Doe, was not under the company's control, and because Defendant did not have the duty to investigate its employees' private communications, therefore indicating an absence of proximate cause linking the company to the harm suffered by Jill.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

The Benefits of Blockchain for e-Discovery and Data Preservation Image

As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.