Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
NJ Court Finds Duty on Part of Employer to Exercise Reasonable Care on Employee's Viewing of Child Pornography
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division has held that when an employer has actual or implied knowledge that an employee is using his/her work computer to view pornography, and possibly child pornography, that employer has a duty to investigate and interfere with these activities such that they do not result in harm to third parties. Doe v. XYC Corporation, 2005 WL 3527015 (Dec. 27).
Plaintiff Jane Doe filed an action on behalf of her minor daughter Jill Doe in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County, against Defendant XYC Corporation. The complaint alleged that because the company knew or should have known that its employee, Jane's husband and Jill's stepfather, was using his work computer to view and download child pornography, XYC had a duty to report Employee to the authorities, and that XYC negligently breached that duty, resulting in Employee's ability to continue photographing and molesting Jill Doe. The employee in question, an accountant for XYC, had been cited and reprimanded on numerous occasions for accessing pornographic cites, including child pornography, at his workstation. In June 2001, Employee, who had been secretly photographing and videotaping his 10-year-old stepdaughter at home in nude and semi-nude positions, transmitted three of these photos over the Internet from his work computer in order to gain access to a child pornography site. Following a search of his work space and computer by the Prosecutor's Office, which turned up numerous pornographic images and communications on child pornography cites, Employee was arrested. The lower court, responding to Jane Doe's specific allegations, granted summary judgment for Defendant both because Employee's conduct at home, the illicit photographing and molesting of Jill Doe, was not under the company's control, and because Defendant did not have the duty to investigate its employees' private communications, therefore indicating an absence of proximate cause linking the company to the harm suffered by Jill.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.