Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Divorce and Sale of the Principal Residence

By Martin M. Shenkman
January 27, 2006

The division or other disposition of the marital residence has always been a major issue in most divorces. Given the tremendous increase in the value of homes in recent years, the economic and tax concerns of dealing with the marital residence are even more acute for clients and their advisers. The general rules governing income taxation on the sale of a residence were enacted as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Public Law 105-34, which became effective Aug. 5, 1997. Prior rules concerning home sale rollover, or exclusion of gain by certain older taxpayers, are generally no longer relevant and not discussed in this article.

General Rule Concerning Sale of Home

In general, the tax law is codified in Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Code”) Section 1001. The gain from the sale of property generally equals the excess of the amount realized over the adjusted tax basis, unless another specific statutory exception applies to reduce or eliminate that gain. This is generally investment, less depreciation, plus improvements. In the case of a marital residence, the only statutory provision relevant to reducing or eliminating gain on the sale of your client's residence is Code ' 121, Home Sale Exclusion. The “residence” might include a houseboat, house trailer or stock in a cooperative corporation. Prior Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1034-1(c)(3)(i); Rev. Rul. 74-241, 1974-1 C.B. 68, Rev. Rul. 90-35, 1990-1 C.B. 48. Personal property (such as furniture) will not qualify. Caution should be exercised when relying on authorities under prior law.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.