Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Nine years ago, Congress introduced a new savings tool for investors called the Roth IRA. This new version of an Individual Retirement Account was named after the Senator that was instrumental in its creation, and it offered substantial tax advantages to persons seeking to save for retirement. Effective Jan. 1, 2006, legislation extended the tax advantages of the Roth IRA to include 401(k) plans. The “Roth 401(k)” creates a new option for law firms offering 401(k) plans to partners and employees, and gives participants the opportunity to accumulate significant tax-free wealth during their lifetime.
History of the Roth Ira
Prior to 1986 there was only one type of IRA, which has now come to be known as a “traditional IRA.” Contributions to traditional IRAs were tax-deductible, but all contributions as well as accumulated earnings were subject to income taxes when withdrawn, usually at retirement. Limitations were set so that upper income earners may not be able to utilize them. Then, in 1986, Congress created the “nondeductible IRA,” which limited the deductibility of IRA contributions made by individuals who were covered by other retirement plans such as a 401(k) plan. Contri-butions to a nondeductible IRA were not tax-deductible, nor were they taxed later on upon withdrawal. However, accumulated earnings remained fully taxable at withdrawal. However, there were no limits based on income, so upper income earners could use them. The nondeductible IRA, therefore, is a traditional IRA without the attraction of an up-front tax deduction.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?