Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Live Performance/Ticket Prices
A theater could offer age-based ticket discounts, the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, decided. Pizarro v. Lamb's Players Theatre, D045890. A San Diego theater produced a musical titled “Boomers” and advertised it as the “Musical Revue of a Generation.” People born between 1946 and 1964 were offered tickets at half-price for Wednesday-evening shows. Theatre-goers who weren't in that age group filed suit. The court noted that the applicable test on the plaintiffs' claim of age discrimination under Calif. Civ. Code Sec. 51 was whether the “Boomer” discounts were based on an arbitrary class-based generalization.
The Court of Appeal concluded: “This age-based discount is permissible as reasonable and not arbitrary. A reason given by defendant for providing the discount admission to 'baby-boomers' was to encourage attendance at a family-based entertainment event. … Because a theater ticket discount allows greater access to the theater, public policy favors the disparate treatment, whether the discount is made available to children, seniors or boomers. … As a result of this lack of job security and corresponding lack of disposable income, the 'baby-boomer' generation will benefit from price discounts on family-oriented pastimes, as do children and seniors.”
Minimal bridge dialogue and the selection and ordering of pre-existing musical compositions was sufficient for the stage production “The Three Mo' Tenors” to be an original compilation eligible for copyright protection, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided. Caffey v. Cook, 04 Civ. 313 (RJH). Writer/choreographer/director Marion Caffey conceived the idea for a stage musical featuring African-American tenors performing different musical styles. He then approached Victor Cook, Rodrick Dixon and Thomas Young to be the show's tenors. Caffey and the three vocalists collaborated in developing the show, which included several songs from the singers' repertoire. Caffey then put 32 songs in order and wrote 1.5 pages of text to be inserted between the performances of the compositions. The three vocalists signed engagement agreements that cited their efforts as work for hire. Caffey later registered as copyright in his name “The Three Mo' Tenors” show as a “creation of text of dialogue in combination with a compilation of song lyrics.” After experiencing financial problems, the Three Mo' Partnership, formed to produce the show and including Caffey but not the three vocalists as partners, was placed into receivership. After fulfilling commitments for previously booked shows, the vocalists toured as Cook, Dixon & Young performing without Caffey's consent what was effectively “The Three Mo' Tenors.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?