Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CASE CAPTION: Sean Gallagher v. Granada Entertainment USA Inc., ITV Plc, Paul Jackson, Jane Turton, Ivan Garel-Jones, Andrew Baker, Simon Walshaw, and Stephen Davis, L.A. Superior Court # BC347170.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Wrongful demotion and termination in violation of public policy; violation of Calif. Labor Code Sec. 1102.5; breach of contract; unfair business practices; in-tentional infliction of emotional distress; fraud; and conversion.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: The plaintiff was promoted to vice president of business and legal affairs of Granada Entertainment in Oct. 2001. Two years later, Granada and Carlton Communications merged and formed ITV Plc. At the end of Nov. 2003, the plaintiff raised concerns about alleged illegal and unethical corporate, financial, tax and legal matters, including false representations made to third parties. He complained to various government agencies, including OSHA and the SEC. In Feb. 2004, shortly after expressing more concerns about possible fraud and well before his employment contract expired, he was escorted out of his office and in-formed that he had been fired. The defendants have refused to give the plaintiff his stock options for the years 2002 and 2003 and have kept computer equipment, notebooks and other personal items that were in his office.
PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: Mark Yablonovich, Marc Primo and Monica Balderrama of L.A.'s Initiative Legal Group (310-556-5637).
CASE CAPTION: Media 8 Entertainment and MDP Distribution Inc. v. D.E.J. Productions Inc., Blockbuster Inc. and First Look Studios Inc., L.A. Superior Court # BC346668.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of contract; breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; breach of fiduciary duty; intentional interference with contract; negligent interference with contract; aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; an accounting; and declaratory relief.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: Blockbuster owns D.E.J. Media 8 produced the film “Monster,” starring Charlize Theron and entered into a licensing agreement with D.E.J. Under the deal, Media 8 was to get a minimum of $4.5 million, plus 65% of receipts in excess of the guaranteed amount minus certain expenses and distribution fees. Among other things, Blockbuster caused D.E.J to enter into non-arms length transactions with regard to DVD and video rentals and caused D.E.J. to deduct expenses not incurred. The plaintiffs audited D.E.J.'s books in the summer of 2005 and calculated that D.E.J. underpaid Media 8 by almost $9 million. First Look acquired D.E.J. from Blockbuster in November for $25 million and has also refused to compensate Media 8.
PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL: Steven A. Velkei and Petty W. Tsay of the Los Angeles office of Liner, Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif LLP (310-500-3500).
CASE CAPTION: Sean Gallagher v. Granada Entertainment USA Inc., ITV Plc, Paul Jackson, Jane Turton, Ivan Garel-Jones, Andrew Baker, Simon Walshaw, and Stephen Davis, L.A. Superior Court # BC347170.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Wrongful demotion and termination in violation of public policy; violation of Calif. Labor Code Sec. 1102.5; breach of contract; unfair business practices; in-tentional infliction of emotional distress; fraud; and conversion.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: The plaintiff was promoted to vice president of business and legal affairs of Granada Entertainment in Oct. 2001. Two years later, Granada and Carlton Communications merged and formed ITV Plc. At the end of Nov. 2003, the plaintiff raised concerns about alleged illegal and unethical corporate, financial, tax and legal matters, including false representations made to third parties. He complained to various government agencies, including OSHA and the SEC. In Feb. 2004, shortly after expressing more concerns about possible fraud and well before his employment contract expired, he was escorted out of his office and in-formed that he had been fired. The defendants have refused to give the plaintiff his stock options for the years 2002 and 2003 and have kept computer equipment, notebooks and other personal items that were in his office.
PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: Mark Yablonovich, Marc Primo and Monica Balderrama of L.A.'s Initiative Legal Group (310-556-5637).
CASE CAPTION: Media 8 Entertainment and MDP Distribution Inc. v. D.E.J. Productions Inc.,
CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of contract; breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; breach of fiduciary duty; intentional interference with contract; negligent interference with contract; aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; an accounting; and declaratory relief.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: Blockbuster owns D.E.J. Media 8 produced the film “Monster,” starring Charlize Theron and entered into a licensing agreement with D.E.J. Under the deal, Media 8 was to get a minimum of $4.5 million, plus 65% of receipts in excess of the guaranteed amount minus certain expenses and distribution fees. Among other things, Blockbuster caused D.E.J to enter into non-arms length transactions with regard to DVD and video rentals and caused D.E.J. to deduct expenses not incurred. The plaintiffs audited D.E.J.'s books in the summer of 2005 and calculated that D.E.J. underpaid Media 8 by almost $9 million. First Look acquired D.E.J. from Blockbuster in November for $25 million and has also refused to compensate Media 8.
PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL: Steven A. Velkei and Petty W. Tsay of the Los Angeles office of Liner, Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif LLP (310-500-3500).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.