Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, ordered summary dismissal of a suit over a fan who died after chasing a Britney Spears impersonator outside a radio station. Santodonato v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, 97744.
A Clear Channel station broadcast a pre-recorded interview with Britney Spears. The appellate division noted, “the promotional spots aired in advance of the interview apparently conveyed the impression that Spears would be interviewed live at the station. On the day of the interview itself, a Spears impersonator arrived at the station by limousine and was escorted inside by three individuals wearing jackets bearing the name of Spears' record label.” When the limousine moved to a side entrance, Susan Santodonato headed there with a crowd of fans but fell and died the next day.
Santodonato's estate sued for negligent crowd control, but the appellate division emphasized “the evidence showed that there were many individuals present who safely avoided the flow of the crowd. Moreover, … no one was within decedent's immediate vicinity in the moments preceding her accident.”
As for the estate's fraud claim, the appellate division concluded: “Even assuming that defendant's misrepresentations facilitated decedent's presence at defendant's radio station, plaintiff has nonetheless failed to adduce any proof concerning the actual cause of decedent's fall.”
The
A Clear Channel station broadcast a pre-recorded interview with Britney Spears. The appellate division noted, “the promotional spots aired in advance of the interview apparently conveyed the impression that Spears would be interviewed live at the station. On the day of the interview itself, a Spears impersonator arrived at the station by limousine and was escorted inside by three individuals wearing jackets bearing the name of Spears' record label.” When the limousine moved to a side entrance, Susan Santodonato headed there with a crowd of fans but fell and died the next day.
Santodonato's estate sued for negligent crowd control, but the appellate division emphasized “the evidence showed that there were many individuals present who safely avoided the flow of the crowd. Moreover, … no one was within decedent's immediate vicinity in the moments preceding her accident.”
As for the estate's fraud claim, the appellate division concluded: “Even assuming that defendant's misrepresentations facilitated decedent's presence at defendant's radio station, plaintiff has nonetheless failed to adduce any proof concerning the actual cause of decedent's fall.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.