Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Norman Cruz was stuck at a big firm with no place to grow.
After 9 years as a real estate associate with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, the 36-year-old Boalt Hall School of Law graduate knew the likelihood of making partner was slim.
To build a client base, he'd need to hurdle high billing rates, conflicts of interest and the firm's decision not to focus on real estate.
While he stresses he enjoyed working at Wilson, “as you get more senior, you need to think about building your own practice. I found it difficult to do.”
One Cherry at A Time
To Kenneth Lund, managing partner of mid-market firm Holme Roberts & Owen, Cruz was ripe for the picking.
Lund specifically cherry-picks young guns from the state's biggest and best firms, enticing them with flexible billing rates, shorter partnership tracks, oodles of support and a free rein.
He gets their untapped potential, while they get a chance to shift their careers into high gear. With clients such as Visa USA, Lockheed Martin and Sun Microsystems, Match.com couldn't have done better.
His is a more proactive ' if tedious ' hiring strategy other mid-market firms are adopting. Rather than target highly sought-after rainmakers or hope for a ready-made practice group to shake loose from a large firm, these practices are building their offices piecemeal.
“It gives us the opportunity to service a niche ' still premium ' and attract really high-caliber people,” Lund says.
To offset the risks associated with not hiring tried-and-true rainmakers, Lund often consults with clients on which lawyers they trust. This also has the added benefit of building up client relationships and ensures a good match between lawyer and customers.
So far, this strategy has paid off. In the last 3 years, the firm has hired 16 laterals, five of them partners from firms such as Heller Ehrman; Morrison & Foerster; Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman; and Latham & Watkins.
In terms of billing rates, firms such as Lund's charge up to 30% less than the $700-an-hour average billed at large firms.
Smart Approach
Recruiter Avis Caravello says the Lund approach works well today, and is a smart adaptation some mid-market firms would benefit from making.
“Many firms make a mistake ' they make a lateral hire and wait for the business to roll in,” she says. “But it is an outdated concept in the Bay Area where we've tapped out the power pool.”
Instead, Caravello says firms must be willing to take some risk and commit the time and resources to draw out a new hire's potential.
“I call it an investment hire,” she says. “The firms that are very serious about growing are buying this philosophy.”
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold Chairman Kevin Dunne says that in some ways, grooming young lawyers is following the path of least resistance.
“Someone with a huge book of business is going to want a huge amount of money,” he says. Sedgwick has bolstered its transactional group and intellectual property practice through lateral hires that are attracted by lower billing rates and the title of counsel or partner on arrival. Sedgwick can charge $485 an hour.
More Control, Brighter Future For Hires
Even mid-market firms with a global platform are adopting the cherry-picking strategy.
With 18 offices worldwide and 1,000 lawyers, Reed Smith is busy scouring the Bay Area job market for talent to add to its efforts to “significantly grow.”
While San Francisco Managing Partner David Thompson says he would jump at the chance to hire an entire practice group, it's still a blue-moon opportunity. The firms' strong lateral culture has led to the addition of 17 new hires in San Francisco, seven of them partner.
“To compete, we have to have a vision,” Thompson says. “We have to anticipate who the candidates are who might not be realizing all they would like … and who can break out at Reed Smith.”
For young lawyers who appreciate the opportunities their new mid-market firm provides, trading in a big name for more control over their future is worth it.
“Now my success hinges on my ability to bring in new clients,” says Cruz, Holme's new hire. “They're giving me all the tools. If it doesn't happen, it would be my fault.”
Norman Cruz was stuck at a big firm with no place to grow.
After 9 years as a real estate associate with
To build a client base, he'd need to hurdle high billing rates, conflicts of interest and the firm's decision not to focus on real estate.
While he stresses he enjoyed working at Wilson, “as you get more senior, you need to think about building your own practice. I found it difficult to do.”
One Cherry at A Time
To Kenneth Lund, managing partner of mid-market firm
Lund specifically cherry-picks young guns from the state's biggest and best firms, enticing them with flexible billing rates, shorter partnership tracks, oodles of support and a free rein.
He gets their untapped potential, while they get a chance to shift their careers into high gear. With clients such as Visa USA,
His is a more proactive ' if tedious ' hiring strategy other mid-market firms are adopting. Rather than target highly sought-after rainmakers or hope for a ready-made practice group to shake loose from a large firm, these practices are building their offices piecemeal.
“It gives us the opportunity to service a niche ' still premium ' and attract really high-caliber people,” Lund says.
To offset the risks associated with not hiring tried-and-true rainmakers, Lund often consults with clients on which lawyers they trust. This also has the added benefit of building up client relationships and ensures a good match between lawyer and customers.
So far, this strategy has paid off. In the last 3 years, the firm has hired 16 laterals, five of them partners from firms such as Heller Ehrman;
In terms of billing rates, firms such as Lund's charge up to 30% less than the $700-an-hour average billed at large firms.
Smart Approach
Recruiter Avis Caravello says the Lund approach works well today, and is a smart adaptation some mid-market firms would benefit from making.
“Many firms make a mistake ' they make a lateral hire and wait for the business to roll in,” she says. “But it is an outdated concept in the Bay Area where we've tapped out the power pool.”
Instead, Caravello says firms must be willing to take some risk and commit the time and resources to draw out a new hire's potential.
“I call it an investment hire,” she says. “The firms that are very serious about growing are buying this philosophy.”
“Someone with a huge book of business is going to want a huge amount of money,” he says. Sedgwick has bolstered its transactional group and intellectual property practice through lateral hires that are attracted by lower billing rates and the title of counsel or partner on arrival. Sedgwick can charge $485 an hour.
More Control, Brighter Future For Hires
Even mid-market firms with a global platform are adopting the cherry-picking strategy.
With 18 offices worldwide and 1,000 lawyers,
While San Francisco Managing Partner David Thompson says he would jump at the chance to hire an entire practice group, it's still a blue-moon opportunity. The firms' strong lateral culture has led to the addition of 17 new hires in San Francisco, seven of them partner.
“To compete, we have to have a vision,” Thompson says. “We have to anticipate who the candidates are who might not be realizing all they would like … and who can break out at
For young lawyers who appreciate the opportunities their new mid-market firm provides, trading in a big name for more control over their future is worth it.
“Now my success hinges on my ability to bring in new clients,” says Cruz, Holme's new hire. “They're giving me all the tools. If it doesn't happen, it would be my fault.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.