Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Decision of Note: </b>Trial Court Rules On 'Recording Commencement'
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York upheld a jury determination in favor of a producer plaintiff on the meaning of 'commencement of recording' in a production-release agreement. T.E.A.M. Entertainment Inc. v. Douglas, 04 Civ. 1552.
Artist Ashanti and her mother had asked Gerald Parker to help them find a major-label deal. Ashanti and Parker entered into two production agreements. But after a year, Ashanti asked to be released so that she could go after a deal with Noontime Music, one of Parker's competitors. Parker signed an agreement releasing Ashanti that, in addition to a royalty-percentage right, stated:
'You [Parker's company T.E.A.M.] shall have the right to produce two (2) masters for my [Ashanti's] first album recorded pursuant to the Noontime Agreement [i.e. Ashanti's record agreement with Noontime]. You should be paid an all-in recording fund in the amount of $25,000 for each said two (2) masters ($10,000 of which, per master shall be deemed to be a recoupable producer' fee advance) exclusive of mastering costs and fees or advances payable to Ashanti Douglas or us for recording. Said advance shall be payable to you one half (1/2) upon the commencement of recording and the balance upon the delivery to and acceptance of the masters by Noontime Music, Inc.'
Parker filed suit against Ashanti and her mother after he received no payments. The defendants claimed that the term 'commencement of recording' was a term of art that the drafting lawyer testified meant 'when you have songs, the songs are approved, you submit a budget, and then you begin the recording process.' Parker testified, however: 'I commenced [recording] by ' continuing to embellish the recordings that we had with previously worked on, that I thought ' not that I thought ' that I knew that I was told that this new company had taken some sort of a liking to, with the hope that maybe they would use these, one of these songs, and I continued to commence by creating new material that I felt would be suitable for the project. ' As far as the new ' recordings that I was ' would hope to be used by Ashanti, I would create from the starting with the
creative sessions and editing sessions.'
The trial court told the jury that '[contract] terms are to be given their ordinary meanings except where the terms are specifically defined in the contract or where you find that they are terms of art and should be given the special meanings testified to.' The jury decided that the defendants breached the release agreement.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.