Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Supreme Court Rejects Per Se Rule That a Patent Confers 'Market Power' in Antitrust Cases
On March 1, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 126 S. Ct. 1281 (2006) and eliminated the presumption that a patent confers market power on the patent owner in antitrust 'tying' cases. Under the new test, an antitrust plaintiff must provide proof that the defendant has market power in the tying product.
In this case, Trident, Inc., a subsidiary of Illinois Tool Works, Inc., manufactures printheads and ink for use in its printheads. The printheads are patent protected, but the ink is not. Trident required manufacturers who licensed its printhead technology to only purchase Trident ink. Independent Ink, which manufactures ink compatible with Trident printheads, sued Trident alleging that Trident violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by tying sales of its non-patented ink to its patented printheads.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.