Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What is it about the people who serve on juries? One group recently decided that a Philadelphia restaurant should pay more than $100,000 to Amber Carson after she slipped on a wet floor and broke her tailbone. The award was not necessarily unreasonable ' except when one considers that the floor was wet because the plaintiff, fighting with her boyfriend, had tossed a drink at him seconds before she fell!
A different collection of peers decided that Terrence Dickson of Bristol, PA, was entitled to about $500,000 to compensate him for mental anguish. The jury's award in this dispute might have been supportable, but the plaintiff claimed that he had suffered his injuries after robbing the home of a family on vacation ' and getting locked in the garage for more than a week, surviving only on soda and dog food!
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.