Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Third Circuit Finds Employer's Saturday Work Policy Not Biased Against Orthodox Jew
The Third Circuit has held that a Quest Diagnostics Inc. (Quest) policy requiring employees to work two Saturdays a month did not discriminate against an Orthodox-observant Jew who was not hired because he could not work on the Sabbath. Aron v. Quest Diag-nostics Inc., 2006 WL 859034 (April 3).
Stuart Aron, an Orthodox Jew, was not hired by Quest, a clinical testing company, for the position of phlebotomist because he could not conform to its policy requiring all employees to work two Saturdays per month. Aron sued Quest in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey claiming that the company violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when it did not hire him. The District Court, liberally construing Aron's complaint as claiming religious discrimination based on disparate treatment, disparate impact, and failure to accommodate Aron's religious beliefs, granted summary judgment for Quest.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?