Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Transport Workers Union Fined $2.5 Million for New York City Transit Strike
On April 17, New York Supreme Court Kings County Justice Theodore T. Jones ordered a $2.5 million fine against the Transport Workers Union Local 100 (Local 100 or the Union) for their 3-day illegal transit strike against the New York City subway and bus system in December 2005. New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union, N.Y. Sup. Ct., No. 37469/05 (April 17).
The action, in which state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer represented the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), the state parent body of the New York City Transit Authority, also suspended the Union's automatic dues check-off indefinitely, but suggested that the Union would be able to restore the check-off after 90 days. These penalties against the Union followed an April 10th ruling that sentenced Local 100's president, Roger Toussaint, to a 10-day jail term and imposed a $1000 fine against him for defying an injunction barring the strike.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?