Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Recent Developments from Around the States

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
May 30, 2006

Oregon Medical Marijuana User Not 'Disabled'

Reversing the Court of Appeal's decision regarding the definition of 'disabled' under Oregon anti-discrimination law, the Oregon Supreme Court held that because a medical marijuana user was able to counteract his physical impairment through mitigating measures, his impairment did not rise to the level of a substantial limitation on a major life activity and was therefore not a 'disability' for purposes of state law. Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., 2006 WL 1173152 (Or. May 4).

Plaintiff Robert Washburn, a millwright at defendant Columbia Forest Products, Inc. (Columbia Forest), suffered from muscle spasms in his legs that, left untreated, limited his ability to sleep. While Washburn had previously used prescription medication to alleviate the spasms and allow him to rest, his doctor later approved his participation in Oregon's medical marijuana program. Washburn, finding the use of marijuana more effective than the prescription drugs at improving his condition, began smoking each night before going to bed. Columbia Forest has a workplace drug policy that prohibits employees from reporting to work with a controlled substance, defined to include cannabis, in their system, and imposes discipline, up through and including termination, on employees that violate this policy. When Columbia Forest's tests of Washburn's urine detected the presence of marijuana in his system, he was placed on a leave of absence. While Washburn subsequently requested that his employer accommodate his condition by allowing him to take a drug test capable of determining present drug impairment, the parties' negotiations in that regard did not produce an agreement, and Columbia Forest ultimately terminated Washburn's employment.

Holding that Washburn's status as a disabled person under Oregon law must take into account any mitigating measures that ameliorate his impairment, the Oregon Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal's judgment to the contrary and held that Washburn's medical marijuana use effectively counteracted his muscle spasms enough to take him outside of the definition of 'disabled' under state statute.

Oregon Medical Marijuana User Not 'Disabled'

Reversing the Court of Appeal's decision regarding the definition of 'disabled' under Oregon anti-discrimination law, the Oregon Supreme Court held that because a medical marijuana user was able to counteract his physical impairment through mitigating measures, his impairment did not rise to the level of a substantial limitation on a major life activity and was therefore not a 'disability' for purposes of state law. Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., 2006 WL 1173152 (Or. May 4).

Plaintiff Robert Washburn, a millwright at defendant Columbia Forest Products, Inc. (Columbia Forest), suffered from muscle spasms in his legs that, left untreated, limited his ability to sleep. While Washburn had previously used prescription medication to alleviate the spasms and allow him to rest, his doctor later approved his participation in Oregon's medical marijuana program. Washburn, finding the use of marijuana more effective than the prescription drugs at improving his condition, began smoking each night before going to bed. Columbia Forest has a workplace drug policy that prohibits employees from reporting to work with a controlled substance, defined to include cannabis, in their system, and imposes discipline, up through and including termination, on employees that violate this policy. When Columbia Forest's tests of Washburn's urine detected the presence of marijuana in his system, he was placed on a leave of absence. While Washburn subsequently requested that his employer accommodate his condition by allowing him to take a drug test capable of determining present drug impairment, the parties' negotiations in that regard did not produce an agreement, and Columbia Forest ultimately terminated Washburn's employment.

Holding that Washburn's status as a disabled person under Oregon law must take into account any mitigating measures that ameliorate his impairment, the Oregon Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal's judgment to the contrary and held that Washburn's medical marijuana use effectively counteracted his muscle spasms enough to take him outside of the definition of 'disabled' under state statute.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.