Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Time-Buy Telecast Deals/Renewal Options
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that a television-production company breached its obligation to in good faith negotiate a renewal option for a time-buy agreement for the airing of additional power-boat racing programs on the plaintiff's network. Network Enterprises Inc. v. APBA Offshore Productions Inc., 01 Civ.11765 (CSH). APBA Offshore Productions procured sponsorships and produced programming for offshore racing. The company entered into a time-buy agreement in August 2000 with the TNN cable channel for the telecast of 10 half-hour episodes of power-boat offshore national races. A renewal-option rider attached to the agreement stated:
'TNN hereby grants to Purchaser the option to exhibit up to thirteen (13) additional original Episodes over TNN's cable programming service from October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, under the same terms and conditions as this Agreement at a fee of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00) per Episode. The dates and times of such telecasts shall be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Such option shall be executed, if at all, by Purchaser delivering notice thereof to TNN which notice shall be received by TNN no later than March 1, 2001.'
A few months later, the parties began negotiating a contract to replace the original time-buy agreement, though Michael Weiss ' the owner of ABPA Offshore Productions (now without TNN's knowledge conducting business as the new corporate entity APBA Offshore Power Boat Racing LLC ['LLC'], formed by Weiss and several investors) ' sent a letter on March 1, 2001, exercising the option. But after a new agreement couldn't be reached, LLC decided instead to widen its TV-programming deal with the Speed Vision cable network. TNN responded with its breach-of-contract action, arguing that 'the solitary issue in this case is whether, pursuant to that exercised option, the parties reached an agreement as to the specific dates and times for the broadcast of Productions' programming in 2001.' The defendants claimed 'no binding contract exists since the parties never agreed upon the material terms of the Renewal Option Rider,' meaning 'the times, dates, and number of telecasts.' The district judge found:
'that Allweiss, having exercised the Renewal Option on March 1, 2001, had conversations with [Brian] Hughes[, TNN's Senior Vice President of Sports and Outdoors,] during July on the subject of the number, dates and times of the 2001 telecasts that would appear on TNN in fulfillment of that exercised option. It is reasonable to infer that such conversations took place at that time, because the Renewal Option provided that 'the dates and times of such telecasts shall be mutually agreed by the parties hereto,' with the programming to begin on Oct. 1, 2001, only 3 months away. I further find that Allweiss made statements to Hughes during those July conversations that, to put it no higher than this, caused Hughes to believe that Allweiss had agreed to the dates and times of the 2001 telecasts that TNN then included in the written [but unfinalized] Amendment [to the time-buy agreement] TNN sent to Allweiss on August 7.'
The district court cautioned, however, that on the renewal option the parties hadn't entered into what is know as a 'Type I preliminary agreement,' which is one that is 'complete, reflecting a meeting of the minds on all the issues perceived to require negotiation.' The court did find a 'Type II preliminary agreement,' that is one that 'does not commit the parties to their ultimate contractual objective but rather to the obligation to negotiate the open issues in good faith in an attempt to reach the objective within the agreed framework.'
The court continued: '[T]he 2000 Agreement between TNN and Productions was executed by both parties and the scheduled programming for the 2000 offshore power boat racing season fully performed and paid for. The Renewal Option was a part of the 2000 Agreement and consequently also binding upon both parties. On March 1, 2001, Allweiss caused [through his letter to TNN] the Productions/LLC corporate entity to exercise the Renewal Option. If Allweiss had let the option lapse, TNN/Network would have had no ground to complain; but the exercise of the option obligated TNN to commit the time to broadcast the 2001 racing season telecasts, and obligated Productions/LLC to produce the telecasts and pay for the broadcast time. To be sure, the Renewal Option required that the number of telecasts ('up to thirteen') and their dates and times be 'mutually agreed by the parties hereto,' so that the renewal agreement was in those respects preliminary. However, I conclude that the parties at bar intended to create a Type II preliminary agreement, with the result that they were bound to negotiate in good faith terms necessary to achieve the ultimate contractual objective of telecasting the 2001 racing season.
'The conclusion is inescapable that not only did Productions/LCC fail to negotiate these terms in good faith, it failed and refused to negotiate them at all. It follows that the corporate defendant breached the Type II preliminary agreement between the parties. ' Allweiss, according to his testimony, was not giving Hughes any answers on the dates and times of the 2001 telecasts because he was trying to leverage the exercised Renewal Option into a new and more favorable future deal; and, when that effort failed, Allweiss simply pulled the plug (so to speak) on Network and entered into a contract with a competitor. The corporate defendant's breach of its contractual obligation to negotiate in good faith the open terms within the framework of the 2001 programming is manifest.'
The court assessed breach damages of $400,000, based on what the judge concluded would have been at least 10 agreed-on additional episodes for the contractual time-buy fee of $40,000 each. The court also ruled that Weiss was jointly and severally liable for the damages due to his ”complete domination over the corporation with respect to the transaction at issue' ' namely, the exercise of the Renewal Option and the negotiation of its terms. With respect to that transaction, Allweiss's domination of Productions was total.'
' Stan Soocher
Time-Buy Telecast Deals/Renewal Options
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
'TNN hereby grants to Purchaser the option to exhibit up to thirteen (13) additional original Episodes over TNN's cable programming service from October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, under the same terms and conditions as this Agreement at a fee of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00) per Episode. The dates and times of such telecasts shall be mutually agreed to by the parties hereto. Such option shall be executed, if at all, by Purchaser delivering notice thereof to TNN which notice shall be received by TNN no later than March 1, 2001.'
A few months later, the parties began negotiating a contract to replace the original time-buy agreement, though Michael Weiss ' the owner of ABPA Offshore Productions (now without TNN's knowledge conducting business as the new corporate entity APBA Offshore Power Boat Racing LLC ['LLC'], formed by Weiss and several investors) ' sent a letter on March 1, 2001, exercising the option. But after a new agreement couldn't be reached, LLC decided instead to widen its TV-programming deal with the Speed Vision cable network. TNN responded with its breach-of-contract action, arguing that 'the solitary issue in this case is whether, pursuant to that exercised option, the parties reached an agreement as to the specific dates and times for the broadcast of Productions' programming in 2001.' The defendants claimed 'no binding contract exists since the parties never agreed upon the material terms of the Renewal Option Rider,' meaning 'the times, dates, and number of telecasts.' The district judge found:
'that Allweiss, having exercised the Renewal Option on March 1, 2001, had conversations with [Brian] Hughes[, TNN's Senior Vice President of Sports and Outdoors,] during July on the subject of the number, dates and times of the 2001 telecasts that would appear on TNN in fulfillment of that exercised option. It is reasonable to infer that such conversations took place at that time, because the Renewal Option provided that 'the dates and times of such telecasts shall be mutually agreed by the parties hereto,' with the programming to begin on Oct. 1, 2001, only 3 months away. I further find that Allweiss made statements to Hughes during those July conversations that, to put it no higher than this, caused Hughes to believe that Allweiss had agreed to the dates and times of the 2001 telecasts that TNN then included in the written [but unfinalized] Amendment [to the time-buy agreement] TNN sent to Allweiss on August 7.'
The district court cautioned, however, that on the renewal option the parties hadn't entered into what is know as a 'Type I preliminary agreement,' which is one that is 'complete, reflecting a meeting of the minds on all the issues perceived to require negotiation.' The court did find a 'Type II preliminary agreement,' that is one that 'does not commit the parties to their ultimate contractual objective but rather to the obligation to negotiate the open issues in good faith in an attempt to reach the objective within the agreed framework.'
The court continued: '[T]he 2000 Agreement between TNN and Productions was executed by both parties and the scheduled programming for the 2000 offshore power boat racing season fully performed and paid for. The Renewal Option was a part of the 2000 Agreement and consequently also binding upon both parties. On March 1, 2001, Allweiss caused [through his letter to TNN] the Productions/LLC corporate entity to exercise the Renewal Option. If Allweiss had let the option lapse, TNN/Network would have had no ground to complain; but the exercise of the option obligated TNN to commit the time to broadcast the 2001 racing season telecasts, and obligated Productions/LLC to produce the telecasts and pay for the broadcast time. To be sure, the Renewal Option required that the number of telecasts ('up to thirteen') and their dates and times be 'mutually agreed by the parties hereto,' so that the renewal agreement was in those respects preliminary. However, I conclude that the parties at bar intended to create a Type II preliminary agreement, with the result that they were bound to negotiate in good faith terms necessary to achieve the ultimate contractual objective of telecasting the 2001 racing season.
'The conclusion is inescapable that not only did Productions/LCC fail to negotiate these terms in good faith, it failed and refused to negotiate them at all. It follows that the corporate defendant breached the Type II preliminary agreement between the parties. ' Allweiss, according to his testimony, was not giving Hughes any answers on the dates and times of the 2001 telecasts because he was trying to leverage the exercised Renewal Option into a new and more favorable future deal; and, when that effort failed, Allweiss simply pulled the plug (so to speak) on Network and entered into a contract with a competitor. The corporate defendant's breach of its contractual obligation to negotiate in good faith the open terms within the framework of the 2001 programming is manifest.'
The court assessed breach damages of $400,000, based on what the judge concluded would have been at least 10 agreed-on additional episodes for the contractual time-buy fee of $40,000 each. The court also ruled that Weiss was jointly and severally liable for the damages due to his ”complete domination over the corporation with respect to the transaction at issue' ' namely, the exercise of the Renewal Option and the negotiation of its terms. With respect to that transaction, Allweiss's domination of Productions was total.'
' Stan Soocher
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.