Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
While savvy users of the Internet may be aware of the multitude of ways that personal information can be monitored and collected on the Web, most users are likely oblivious to the information trail they leave behind. How many readers of this publication, a population plainly concerned with privacy issues, have read the privacy policies of their favorite Web sites? If you have not, you may be surprised to learn about the amount of information collected by even the most popular and mainstream sites. For example, when a user requests and views a Web page from Yahoo!, that request is logged on Yahoo!'s servers with information including the IP address of the computer that requested the page. Even if information is not purposely collected, just about everything a person does on the Web is stored somewhere for at least some period of time.
Web surfers may take some comfort in the fact that the information they leave behind often does not itself contain their names or other personal identifying information. What the information often does contain, however, is their IP addresses. An IP address is a unique address assigned to every computer on the Internet. An Internet Service Provider can easily determine the name of a customer from an IP address used during a particular time period. As a result, finding the identity of users on the Web is often just a subpoena away.
Fundamentally, one question is what, if anything, sets information on the Web apart from other types of information, such as personal diaries and anonymously authored articles, in which people have an expectation of privacy or anonymity? It is not uncommon, even in non-Web situations, for information expected to remain private or anonymous to be revealed as a result of a subpoena or other legal process. One important distinction, however, is that in such a non-Web situation, an individual is typically aware of the documents and records he or she is creating. In contrast, on the Web, enormous amounts of private information may be collected about an individual without that person having any clue at all.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.