Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
e-Commerce firms have aggressively marketed themselves as the new kids on the block. They eagerly discard old ways of doing business, confident that their way of doing business ' online ' is better. It's an e-commerce article of faith that everyone can work more efficiently if he or she would only eliminate outdated practices that don't take advantage of the conveniences available online.
Often, these denizens of all things digital have been correct. Consider the many fields that have been revolutionized ' and jobs that have been eliminated ' by 'new economy' firms. The Internet has not been a friend to individual real estate agents, travel agents and booksellers, however much it has helped their customers and clients. Increasing online access and familiarity have even transformed something as mundane as paying bills, in one of the quiet Internet success stories recently heralded in The New York Times (see, www.nytimes.com/2006/05/29/technology/29ecom.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin, subscription or purchase required).
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.