Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
e-Commerce firms have aggressively marketed themselves as the new kids on the block. They eagerly discard old ways of doing business, confident that their way of doing business ' online ' is better. It's an e-commerce article of faith that everyone can work more efficiently if he or she would only eliminate outdated practices that don't take advantage of the conveniences available online.
Often, these denizens of all things digital have been correct. Consider the many fields that have been revolutionized ' and jobs that have been eliminated ' by 'new economy' firms. The Internet has not been a friend to individual real estate agents, travel agents and booksellers, however much it has helped their customers and clients. Increasing online access and familiarity have even transformed something as mundane as paying bills, in one of the quiet Internet success stories recently heralded in The New York Times (see, www.nytimes.com/2006/05/29/technology/29ecom.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin, subscription or purchase required).
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.