Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Courthouse Steps
CASE CAPTION: John Cassese, Mark Wolfe, Maria Lamagra and Brian Nelson v. Martin Erlichman Associates Inc., Fox Broadcasting Co., Dick Clark Productions and 19 Entertainment Inc., L.A. Superior Court # BC353893.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of contract; conversion; intentional inter-ference with economic relationship; negligent interference with economic relationship; breach of fiduciary duty; and unfair competition.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: The plaintiffs created the concept for a reality TV series entitled, 'So You Think You Can Dance.' In July 2003, they met with Martin Erlichman, principal of Erlichman Associates, to discuss the concept. Erlichman agreed to present it to Creative Artists Agency and to shop it to companies, including Fox. After Sept. 30, 2003, Erlichman didn't respond to the plaintiffs' communication attempts. In June 2005, Fox released plans for its series nearly identical to the plaintiffs' concept began airing the show in July 2005.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?