Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Do Keyword Search Terms Constitute 'Use' of a Trademark?
It has been judicially noted that '[t]he Court must avoid excessive rigidity when applying the law in the Internet context because emerging technologies require a flexible approach.' Edina Realty Inc. v. TheMLSonline.com, D. Minn., No. 04-4371, March 20, 2006, citing Brookfield Commc'ns, Inc. v. W. Coast Entm't Corp., 174 F.3d 1036, 1054 (9th Cir. 1999) (4 ECLR 384, May 5, 1999). Recently, conflicts involving one of the emerging Internet technologies, namely sponsored online key word advertising, have yielded, not only judicial flexibility, but also a fair amount of ambiguity in applying the laws of trademark infringement in Internet advertising contexts. Two recent federal district court decisions on the issue ' Edina Realty v. TheMLSonline.com, D. Minn., No. 04-4371, March 20, 2006; and Merck & Co. Inc. v. Mediplan Health Consulting Inc. d/b/a RXNorth.com, S.D.N.Y., No. 05 Civ 36550, March 30, 2006 ' illustrate the current legal muddle in their diametrically opposite conclusions on the threshold question at the heart of each analysis: Does the purchase and use of key word search terms constitute 'use' of a trademark under the Lanham Act?
In both Edina and Merck, the defendants purchased from Internet search engines Google and Yahoo! the right to have their advertisements appear at the top or along the side of the search results page as 'Sponsored Ads' when a user types a competitor's name, which happens to contain a registered trademark. In the view of many trademark owners, these practices seem unfair because they electronically piggyback on the notoriety or goodwill of leading trademarks to generate and divert Internet traffic to a competitor's Web site. In any event, the practice is becoming more common in online advertising, a market that by all accounts is fast approaching and likely to surpass the advertising revenues of broadcast television and other more traditional media advertising venues.
'Use' of a Mark Defined
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?