Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Attorney-Fee Ruling</b> Copyright Litigation
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied attorney fees to Fox Entertainment despite a stipulated dismissal with prejudice of a copyright suit against the company. Ninox Television, Ltd. v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., 04 CIV. 7891 (DLC). Ninox had filed suit in Manhattan federal court alleging that Fox's reality TV series 'The Complex: Malibu' was substantially similar to Ninox's New Zealand-based series, 'Dream Home.' Soon after, Nine Films & Television. Pty Ltd., which had licensed the right to Fox to produce 'The Complex: Malibu,' filed a complaint against Ninox in Australia for a declaration that Nine's series 'The Block' didn't infringe on 'Dream Home.' After Nine won its case, Fox moved for an award of attorney fees under Sec. 505 of the Copyright Act as a prevailing party in the New York case brought by Ninox.
The Manhattan federal district court decided: 'It appears that Ninox was principally motivated to bring this suit not by issues arising directly under the Copyright Act, but by a mistaken but genuine belief that Fox had tortiously interfered with Ninox's contract rights. Once in the litigation, Ninox tried to make the litigation more burdensome and expensive for Fox, but those efforts were largely unsuccessful. Over Ninox's objections, Fox won a stay of discovery and the right to bring an early summary judgment motion. Much of the cost and burden of litigation rested on Fox's licensor, who undertook the Australian Action. '
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.