Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Attorney-Fee Ruling</b> Copyright Litigation
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied attorney fees to Fox Entertainment despite a stipulated dismissal with prejudice of a copyright suit against the company. Ninox Television, Ltd. v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., 04 CIV. 7891 (DLC). Ninox had filed suit in Manhattan federal court alleging that Fox's reality TV series 'The Complex: Malibu' was substantially similar to Ninox's New Zealand-based series, 'Dream Home.' Soon after, Nine Films & Television. Pty Ltd., which had licensed the right to Fox to produce 'The Complex: Malibu,' filed a complaint against Ninox in Australia for a declaration that Nine's series 'The Block' didn't infringe on 'Dream Home.' After Nine won its case, Fox moved for an award of attorney fees under Sec. 505 of the Copyright Act as a prevailing party in the New York case brought by Ninox.
The Manhattan federal district court decided: 'It appears that Ninox was principally motivated to bring this suit not by issues arising directly under the Copyright Act, but by a mistaken but genuine belief that Fox had tortiously interfered with Ninox's contract rights. Once in the litigation, Ninox tried to make the litigation more burdensome and expensive for Fox, but those efforts were largely unsuccessful. Over Ninox's objections, Fox won a stay of discovery and the right to bring an early summary judgment motion. Much of the cost and burden of litigation rested on Fox's licensor, who undertook the Australian Action. '
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.