Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Courthouse Steps

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
July 27, 2006

CASE CAPTION: Justin C. MacIntosh and Harry Kloor v. USA Networks Interactive LLC, formerly known as USA Networks Inc., L.A. Superior Court #BC355135.

CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of implied-in-fact contract and breach of confidence.

COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: The plaintiffs are film and TV writers. In Nov. 2000, they came up with an idea for a TV series entitled 'Village of the Damned' that they later renamed 'Chosen Ones.' The plaintiffs prepared an introductory bible for the series and pitched it to the defendant. In June 2001, the plaintiffs were told that that the defendant's president, Bonne Hammer, had approved a series based on the bible and had forwarded it to Barry Diller, chairman of USA. In Aug. 2001, the plaintiffs were told that Diller had passed on the project. In Feb. 2002, the plaintiffs slightly revised the project, gave it a new name and resubmitted it. The defendant company passed again. During this time, an entity known as Trilogy Entertainment Group expressed strong interest in working with the plaintiffs as producing partners. There were extensive discussions with Mark Stern of Trilogy; he attended pitch meetings and was attached as a potential co-producer. In Dec. 2002, Stern left Trilogy and became Senior Vice President of Original Programming for USA. In 2003, the defendant company began developing a series called 'The 4400' that was substantially similar to the plaintiffs' project.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.