Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Big Firms Move Into L.A.
When it comes to entertainment law, the big legal players have traditionally emerged from firms that sprung up in Los Angeles, the industry's hometown. But increased lateral movement, coupled with a widening emphasis on technology, has out-of-town firms such as Milwaukee-rooted Foley & Lardner seeing an opportunity to carve out their own entertainment niche. A decade after opening its Los Angeles office, Foley is breaking into the area's signature ' and lucrative ' industry, seeking to build a top-notch entertainment practice from the ground up. Since its official entertainment launch a year ago, the firm has attracted top talent and is relying on those key lateral hires to lead the way.
'The entertainment industry is very relationship-oriented, and there's a lot to developing those relationships over time,' says Miriam Beezy, co-chair of the firm's entertainment team. 'Some of my clients were surprised because they hadn't thought of Foley in entertainment.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?