Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article is intended by the author to comprise Part Four of Four in a series on lawyer retirement planning. Parts One and Two, 'What In the World Is Going on with Lawyer Retirement Planning?' were published in the November and December 2005 issues of LFP&B. Part Three, last month, examined the history of the 401(k) and why there are problems with the popular retirement vehicle. In this part, we find out how to make things better.
Problems with 401(k) Plans ' the Results
Virtually all 401(k) participants are grossly under-funding their retirement accounts. Whatever the performance of your self-directed investments, you almost certainly have under-performed the market. And there is a good reason. You chased the market, buying what had done well in the past, and jumping from one historically good performer to another after the good performance, almost never before. You made inconsistent fund investments and failed to re-balance your portfolio.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?