Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
BANKRUPTCY
Where the landlord does not make a claim in the tenant's bankruptcy proceeding, it is not precluded from seeking the remedies contained in the parties' lease. In re: Stonebridge Technologies, Inc., No. 04-10494, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Nov. 8, 2005.
On Sept. 21, 2000, the landlord and tenant entered into a lease whereby the tenant agreed to lease space in an office building. Under the terms of the lease, the tenant was required to provide a security deposit to the landlord plus an irrevocable stand-by letter of credit for $1.4 million. Thereafter, on Sept. 6, 2001, the tenant filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. On Oct. 22, 2001, the landlord initiated a draw request to the bank under the irrevocable letter of credit for the full amount. The bank rejected the draw request because of some technical deficiencies. On Oct. 23, 2001, the landlord and tenant announced an agreement in open court that the lease would be rejected effective no earlier than Oct. 1, 2001, and no later than Oct. 23, 2001. On Oct. 25, 2001, the landlord corrected the deficiencies in its draw request to the bank, and the bank honored the letter of credit, issuing a check for $1.4 million to the landlord. On Nov. 8, 2001, the bankruptcy court approved the rejection of the lease. However, the landlord never filed a proof of claim for its actual lease rejection damages.
Thereafter, the trustee for the bankruptcy estate of the tenant brought an action against the landlord, claiming breach of the lease by prematurely drawing on the letter of credit and by retaining an amount in excess of the '502(b) cap. The bankruptcy court found in favor of the tenant, and the landlord appealed. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the '502(b) cap did not alter the entitlement of the landlord to the full proceeds of the letter of credit because the landlord did not make a claim against the tenant's estate in bankruptcy. Moreover, the landlord did not breach the lease by prematurely drawing on the letter of credit because the tenant was in default of the lease at the time the landlord sought to draw on the letter of credit, as the tenant was past due and owed rent to the landlord.
BANKRUPTCY
Where the landlord does not make a claim in the tenant's bankruptcy proceeding, it is not precluded from seeking the remedies contained in the parties' lease. In re: Stonebridge Technologies, Inc., No. 04-10494, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Nov. 8, 2005.
On Sept. 21, 2000, the landlord and tenant entered into a lease whereby the tenant agreed to lease space in an office building. Under the terms of the lease, the tenant was required to provide a security deposit to the landlord plus an irrevocable stand-by letter of credit for $1.4 million. Thereafter, on Sept. 6, 2001, the tenant filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. On Oct. 22, 2001, the landlord initiated a draw request to the bank under the irrevocable letter of credit for the full amount. The bank rejected the draw request because of some technical deficiencies. On Oct. 23, 2001, the landlord and tenant announced an agreement in open court that the lease would be rejected effective no earlier than Oct. 1, 2001, and no later than Oct. 23, 2001. On Oct. 25, 2001, the landlord corrected the deficiencies in its draw request to the bank, and the bank honored the letter of credit, issuing a check for $1.4 million to the landlord. On Nov. 8, 2001, the bankruptcy court approved the rejection of the lease. However, the landlord never filed a proof of claim for its actual lease rejection damages.
Thereafter, the trustee for the bankruptcy estate of the tenant brought an action against the landlord, claiming breach of the lease by prematurely drawing on the letter of credit and by retaining an amount in excess of the '502(b) cap. The bankruptcy court found in favor of the tenant, and the landlord appealed. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the '502(b) cap did not alter the entitlement of the landlord to the full proceeds of the letter of credit because the landlord did not make a claim against the tenant's estate in bankruptcy. Moreover, the landlord did not breach the lease by prematurely drawing on the letter of credit because the tenant was in default of the lease at the time the landlord sought to draw on the letter of credit, as the tenant was past due and owed rent to the landlord.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.