Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Increased Scrutiny of Pharmaceutical Company Clinical Trials: The Defense Perspective
In recent large-scale pharmaceutical litigation, plaintiffs' counsel have concentrated significant resources seeking the details of how individual patients in pre- and post-marketing company clinical trials were assessed, characterized, and reported to the Food and Drug Administration ('FDA'). The reason is clear: They are seeking to develop (in the author's opinion unfairly) a story that the pharmaceutical company hid risks and overstated benefits. The efficacy and safety data generated by industry-sponsored studies, and the manner in which the data are analyzed and reported, have therefore become the focus of large-scale pharmaceutical litigation.
Recent events in the Vioxx' litigation show that plaintiffs' counsel are now expanding this approach to industry-sponsored studies submitted to medical journals, with apparent success. The editors of the New England Journal of Medicine ('NEJM') claim that they recently obtained information revealing inaccuracies in the data reported in the VIGOR (Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research) study that calls into question some of the study's conclusions. (Curfman GD, Drazen JM, Morissey S. Expression of concern: Bombardier et al., Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofexicib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1520-8. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2813-14.) Although the VIGOR study was designed to compare gastrointestinal events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with either rofecoxib (Vioxx) or naproxen (Naprosyn'), data on cardiovascular events were also monitored. According to the editors, three myocardial infarctions (heart attacks) in Vioxx patients were incorrectly omitted from the data submitted to the NEJM. The editors concluded that the omission of the three additional heart attacks ' which raised the total number of heart attacks in Vioxx patients from 17 to 20, as opposed to 4 in Naprosyn patients ' rendered certain calculations and conclusions in the VIGOR article 'incorrect' and 'misleading.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.