Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Priorities are the alchemist's stone of the Bankruptcy Code ' they have the power to turn worthless claims into pots of gold. Without priority status, unsecured claims typically receive little or no distributions from the bankruptcy estate. When these claims fall within one of the statutory priorities of ' 507(a)of the Bankruptcy Code, however, they often lead to significant distributions ' sometimes even payment in full. What often separates the 'haves' from the 'have-nots' in the bankruptcy arena is the ability to fit one's claim into the finite list of priorities set forth in ' 507(a).
Section 507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code affords priority treatment to claims for 'wages, salaries, or commissions, including vacation, severance, and sick leave earned by an individual' earned within 90 days of the earlier of the petition date or the cessation of the debtor's business. In two earlier decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc., 359 U.S. 29 (1959), and Joint Industry Bd. of Elec. Industry v. United States, 391 U.S. 224 (1968), health and welfare plans were held not to be 'wages' and thus not entitled to priority treatment under ' 507(a)(4). In response to these decisions, Congress added ' 507(a)(5) to the list of priorities when it amended the Bankruptcy Act in 1978. This new provision was intended to extend priority treatment to other forms of employee compensation not covered by ' 507(a)(4), while establishing a combined monetary cap on the claims that could receive such priority (pursuant to BAPCPA, what were previously ” 507(a)(3) and (a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code were numbered 507(a)(4) and (a)(5) and the combined cap on the priorities was increased to $10,000 per employee). The new provision covered 'contributions to an employee benefit plan'arising from services rendered within 180 days before the date of the filing of the petition or the date of the cessation of the debtor's business, whichever occurs first ' '
The Case
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?