Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Index
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Statute Does Not Require Resident Janitor for Condominium
Hatcher v. Board of Managers of the 420 West 23 Street Condominium
Declaration Does Not Authorize Fine for Garage Sale
Blumberg v. Albicocco
* * *
Development
Zoning Amendment Does Not Require Supermajority
Eadie v. Town Board of the Town of North Greenbush
4-Month SOL Applies to Procedural Challenges to Local Laws
P & N Tiffany Properties, Inc. v. Village of Tuckahoe
No Deference on Pure Questions Of Law
Matter of Brancato v. Zoning Board of Appeals
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Tenant Not Entitled to Rent Paid After Expiration of Main Lease
JPMorganChase Bank, NA v. Rocar Realty Northeast, Inc.
Domestic Partner Not Entitled to Name on Stabilized Lease
Zagrosik v. DHCR
Loft Tenant Not Entitled to Statutory Protection
American Package Company., Inc. v. Kocik
Lease Does Not Bar Partial Actual Eviction Claim
Sterling Investor Services, Inc. v. 1155 Nobo Associates, LLC
* * *
Real Property Law
Co-Tenant's Possession Not Adverse
Russo Realty Corp. v. Orlando
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Statute Does Not Require Resident Janitor for Condominium
Hatcher v. Board of Managers of the 420 West 23 Street Condominium
Declaration Does Not Authorize Fine for Garage Sale
Blumberg v. Albicocco
* * *
Development
Zoning Amendment Does Not Require Supermajority
Eadie v. Town Board of the Town of North Greenbush
4-Month SOL Applies to Procedural Challenges to Local Laws
P & N Tiffany Properties, Inc. v. Village of Tuckahoe
No Deference on Pure Questions Of Law
Matter of Brancato v. Zoning Board of Appeals
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Tenant Not Entitled to Rent Paid After Expiration of Main Lease
JPMorganChase Bank, NA v. Rocar Realty Northeast, Inc.
Domestic Partner Not Entitled to Name on Stabilized Lease
Zagrosik v. DHCR
Loft Tenant Not Entitled to Statutory Protection
American Package Company., Inc. v. Kocik
Lease Does Not Bar Partial Actual Eviction Claim
Sterling Investor Services, Inc. v. 1155 Nobo Associates, LLC
* * *
Real Property Law
Co-Tenant's Possession Not Adverse
Russo Realty Corp. v. Orlando
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.