Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What types of employer conduct can constitute retaliation under Title VII? The answer to that question has changed significantly with a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision. On June 22, 2006, the Court issued its decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co v. White, expanding protections for employees who allege that they have suffered retaliation after making a complaint of discrimination or harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Previously, employees making retaliation claims under Title VII had to prove they suffered an 'ultimate employment decision' or a 'materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment,' such as a discharge, demotion or loss of pay, in order to state a claim. Now, the Court has adopted a broader standard, holding Title VII prohibits subtler forms of retaliation, that can even include, depending on the factual circumstances, a change in schedule or the failure to invite an employee to lunch.
Burlington Northern Background
According to the Court, the proper approach for evaluating whether an employer's conduct was retaliatory is determining whether a 'reasonable employee would have found the challenged action materially adverse.' As the Court explained, this means considering whether the employer's alleged retaliatory act 'might have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.' The Court also found that Title VII's anti-retaliation provision is not limited to actions affecting employment or to those occurring at work, and can extend to actions causing harm outside the workplace. The case has been hailed as a victory by employees' rights groups nationwide. (The opinion is available online at www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/05-259.pdf.)
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.