Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cameo Clips

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 01, 2006

Copyright Infringement/

Chain of Song Ownership

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, denied a copyright-infringement defense motion for summary judgment by citing a genuine issue of material fact as to ownership of the rights at issue. Johnson v. Cypress Hill, 03 C 9452. The disputed issue revolves around the demise of the independent label Twinight Records, which dissolved in 1978. In fact, the case demonstrates the difficulty of determining conflicting small-label ownership years later. The defendants claim that plaintiff Syl Johnson signed a recording agreement with Twinight in 1967 that gave the record label 'the unlimited right, from time to time, to manufacture, by any method now or hereafter known, phonograph records and other reproductions on any mediums or devices now or hereafter known, of the compositions performed by you and recorded hereunder, and to sell, transfer or otherwise deal in the same throughout the world under any trade-marks, trade names and labels.' Johnson denies signing the agreement, but nevertheless claims he owned 25% of Twinight. Johnson also claims he co-wrote the 1968 song, 'Is It Because I'm Black?' The instrumental portion of the song was allegedly used without permission as the 1993 release, 'Interlude,' by the hip-hop group Cypress Hill. In 2004, Cypress Hill entered into a settlement agreement with Sunlight Records, then operating as Twinight/Twilight Records, for a $25,000 payment that absolved the hip-hop group of liability for any claims over its use of 'Is It Because I'm Black?'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.