Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Hedge funds have gone Hollywood. Chasing high returns, money managers are plunking down hundreds of millions of dollars to finance films such as 'Superman Returns' and 'Nanny McPhee.' At the same time, the influx of money from hedge funds and private-equity firms is reshaping film-financing deals, leading entertainment lawyers toward lucrative transactions and new clients who might want a little glamour-by-association. [Editor's Note: Hedge funds are typically private partnerships in which general partners manage limited partners' investments and seek large profits from higher-risk investments.]
'All of a sudden, we've become the focus of East Coast money looking for high returns,' says Michael Mayerson, L.A.-based co-chairman of Loeb & Loeb's entertainment group. 'Almost every weekend, there's a movie in the box office backed with hedge-fund money.'
Among the recent, large-scale private-equity-funded deals:
While some predict the hedge funds could see double-digit returns, picking winners is a notoriously tricky business, even for experienced studio heads. Already there's been at least one notable failure. The hedge-fund-backed company Virtual Studios reportedly lost $50 million on its $125 million investment in the box-office bomb 'Poseidon.' Investing in a portfolio of films can help. 'The risk of one film tanking will be minimized over the time the slate will perform,' says Robert Darwell, a partner in Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton's Century City (L.A.) office who represented one of the hedge funds investing in the Legendary deal.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?