Web Site Best Practices RevealedThe Results of the 2006 AMLAW 100 Web Sites ResearchWeb Audio ConferenceThursday, October 26, 200612:00PM - 2:00PM Eastern
By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 15, 2006
Learn the results of the 2006 AMLAW 100 Web Sites research!
Commissioned by Deborah McMurray, CEO and Strategy Architect for Content Pilot LLC, this is the second annual research study measuring Ten Foundational Web Site Best Practices – and how the AMLAW 100 firms' sites fared.
In 2005, the research was the first of its kind. No Web Site Best Practices existed, and no objective criteria had ever been employed to measure how well or how poorly the nation's largest law firms were doing. The comprehensive White Paper was widely read by firm leaders and marketers wanting to maximize their Web site investments.
Did you know, in 2005, only 4% of the AMLAW 100 firms rated excellent and 52% ranked fair or poor?
By attending this conference you will learn:
The Ten Foundational Best Practices, and the attributes associated with each Best Practice.
The 2006 results for each Foundational Best Practice.
Trends and surprises in Web site design/development.
How marketers can use this data as Competitive Intelligence.
The range of total scores and the top ten ranked AMLAW 100 Web sites for 2006.
Special section on Search Engine Optimization and Marketing (SEO/SEM) and Web site analytics.
Panelists
Deborah McMurray CEO / Strategy Architect Content Pilot LLC
Ken Vernon Director Online Marketing / Creative Content Pilot LLC
Lisa Salazar Manager Internet Marketing Fulbright & Jaworski LLP
David Geyer Chief Marketing Officer Baker Hostetler
Moderator
Elizabeth Lampert Director Law Journal Newsletters Web Audio Conference Division
Learn the results of the 2006 AMLAW 100 Web Sites research!
Commissioned by Deborah McMurray, CEO and Strategy Architect for Content Pilot LLC, this is the second annual research study measuring Ten Foundational Web Site Best Practices – and how the AMLAW 100 firms' sites fared.
In 2005, the research was the first of its kind. No Web Site Best Practices existed, and no objective criteria had ever been employed to measure how well or how poorly the nation's largest law firms were doing. The comprehensive White Paper was widely read by firm leaders and marketers wanting to maximize their Web site investments.
Did you know, in 2005, only 4% of the AMLAW 100 firms rated excellent and 52% ranked fair or poor?
By attending this conference you will learn:
The Ten Foundational Best Practices, and the attributes associated with each Best Practice.
The 2006 results for each Foundational Best Practice.
Trends and surprises in Web site design/development.
How marketers can use this data as Competitive Intelligence.
The range of total scores and the top ten ranked AMLAW 100 Web sites for 2006.
Special section on Search Engine Optimization and Marketing (SEO/SEM) and Web site analytics.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?
